Text: I Corinthians 11
Our intention in the Lord?s church should be to pattern our lives of lifestyles as defined by the Word of God.
In the New Testament, we have a pattern given of what the church should look like, including its members.
The commandments given to the different congregations in the Bible contain these directions.
We learn from them how to live, how to worship God, how to talk, how to think, and how to look.
At the beginning of this study, I hope to make one point clear.
God expects each of us to study the Bible to come to an understanding of the truth and to prove God?s will for our individual life.
At first glance, most Christians do not agree with the position I have taken in this paper.
Such a contrasting view is not surprising, as the mainstream churches of Christ changed its position on this subject sometime early in the 20th Century. For centuries, the church taught on this topic as I will present it today, or least that the woman is commanded to wear a head covering, and have long hair; and the opposite for the man.
All I ask is that you study this with an open mind, please.
The church is not commanded to withhold its fellowship from a woman who cuts her hair or does not choose to wear a covering (unless it is obvious that she is rebelling against her conscience).
However, the scriptures do instruct each of us to exhort or to teach the whole, complete truths regarding every Biblical issue.If you have come to understand the truth on this subject and then fear to obey it or teach it, then God will consider you to have been rebellious to His desires for the church of Christ.
God will consider your refusal to obey as a rejection of Christ and the covenant with Christ and His word.
All Christians who have agreed in their hearts to subject themselves to the will of God, regardless of the personal cost; they will obey these passages of scriptures that we are about to consider.
We must, as always, understand by rightly dividing the word of truth, whether they apply to the church today.
I do understand that not all of the commandments that we find written to the New Testament churches of the 1st Century AD apply to the church of Christ today.
There were some commandments that dealt with specific situations that we can never face today, such as the commandments regarding the use of the miraculous spiritual gifts.
SPEAKING IN TONGUES
The Bible teaches the church of the 1st Century AD how to behave when someone is speaking in tongues in a miraculous manner.
My sermon does not intend to address this particular aspect in depth, but I will briefly attempt to show you that neither you nor I will ever speak in tongues as these early Christians.
Most folks misunderstand the definition of ?speaking in tongues?, thinking they were different than the common foreign languages spoken in the various countries.
They think, in error, that the New Testament ?tongues? were angelic or heavenly sounds.
However, we can quickly prove that they were foreign languages that were spoken somewhere and that someone could understand.
Notice this passage of scripture:
Acts 2:1-8 KJV-- 1 And when the day of Pentecost was fully come, they were all with one accord in one place. 2 And suddenly there came a sound from heaven as of a rushing mighty wind, and it filled all the house where they were sitting. 3 And there appeared unto them cloven tongues like as of fire, and it sat upon each of them. 4 And they were all filled with the Holy Ghost, and began to speak with other tongues, as the Spirit gave them utterance. 5 And there were dwelling at Jerusalem Jews, devout men, out of every nation under heaven. 6 Now when this was noised abroad, the multitude came together, and were confounded, because that every man heard them speak in his own language. 7 And they were all amazed and marvelled, saying one to another, Behold, are not all these which speak Galilaeans? 8 And how hear we every man in our own tongue, wherein we were born?
Please notice that they heard in their own native language from the mouth of unlearned men from Galilee.
Those today who claim to speak in tongues do nothing but speak gibberish than could not be understood by any man if we were to gather together every foreign language expert in the world.
Jesus made the statement that it made sense that one could know the kind of tree that he was looking at by noticing the kind of fruit that hung on its branches; thus teaching us that we can know the false teachers by the false doctrine that disagrees with the scriptures.
Matthew 7:15-23 KJV-- 15 Beware of false prophets, which come to you in sheep's clothing, but inwardly they are ravening wolves. 16 Ye shall know them by their fruits. Do men gather grapes of thorns, or figs of thistles? 17 Even so every good tree bringeth forth good fruit; but a corrupt tree bringeth forth evil fruit. 18 A good tree cannot bring forth evil fruit, neither [can] a corrupt tree bring forth good fruit. 19 Every tree that bringeth not forth good fruit is hewn down, and cast into the fire. 20 Wherefore by their fruits ye shall know them. 21 Not every one that saith unto me, Lord, Lord, shall enter into the kingdom of heaven; but he that doeth the will of my Father which is in heaven. 22 Many will say to me in that day, Lord, Lord, have we not prophesied in thy name? and in thy name have cast out devils? and in thy name done many wonderful works? 23 And then will I profess unto them, I never knew you: depart from me, ye that work iniquity.
Jesus pointed out that in the end, it will have been required that we did the will of God.
IS TONGUE SPEAKING REQUIRED BY God?
There is no doubt that many are honestly deceived into believing that by speaking in some unknown language that they are doing some wonderful work that the Lord will approve.
Does the Lord anywhere command us to speak in an unknown language?
If a person believes such a false doctrine and teaches others that it is a necessary work to prove that they are a Christian, let them take heed to the words of Jesus.
Matthew 12:33-37 KJV---33 Either make the tree good, and his fruit good; or else make the tree corrupt, and his fruit corrupt: for the tree is known by [his] fruit. 34 O generation of vipers, how can ye, being evil, speak good things? for out of the abundance of the heart the mouth speaketh. 35 A good man out of the good treasure of the heart bringeth forth good things: and an evil man out of the evil treasure bringeth forth evil things. 36 But I say unto you, That every idle word that men shall speak, they shall give account thereof in the day of judgment. 37 For by thy words thou shalt be justified, and by thy words thou shalt be condemned.
We understand that the first and second epistles to the Corinthians were letters that addressed or spoke to their own particular problems and questions that they might have had. I and II Corinthians are written for all Christians of all times to guide them to become more pleasing to Christ.
However, as we have given the example of tongue speaking, we learn that not all issues of the 1st Century AD can be those of today.
The purpose of the written scriptures is for our learning; for our instruction in how to be righteous, or right in the sight of God.
2 Timothy 3:16-17 KJV-- 16 All scripture [is] given by inspiration of God, and [is] profitable for doctrine, for reproof, for correction, for instruction in righteousness: 17 That the man of God may be perfect, throughly furnished unto all good works.
Why were the scriptures written down and left for man to read, even centuries later?
We see the answer in the above passage of II Timothy 3.16-17.
God wants you to be complete.
God wants you to know how to be Godly.
God wants you to know how to live pleasing to Him.
To achieve the purposes of God, we must study the written instructions that God left us that show us how to be righteous.
We know from the writings of the Apostle Paul that he intended these instructions to be considered by every saint in every place; if they applied to them and their life.
1 Corinthians 1:1-2 KJV-- 1 Paul, called [to be] an apostle of Jesus Christ through the will of God, and Sosthenes [our] brother, 2 Unto the church of God which is at Corinth, to them that are sanctified in Christ Jesus, called [to be] saints, with all that in every place call upon the name of Jesus Christ our Lord, both theirs and ours:
Do you call upon the name of Jesus Christ?
Do we not call Jesus our Lord?
If so, then the letter written to the church of Christ, located in the city of Corinth, must have some application to the church of Christ in every city of the world today.
We find many useful passages in these letters to the Corinthians.
We have no qualms about quoting the commandments given that regulated marriage, sexual morality, idolatry, worldliness, nor the authority of Christ over the church.
Many a Bible scholar has studied I Corinthians with their particular congregation and when they arrive at the 11th chapter, he does little more than read over the part that deals with the hair and the covering, not even giving it much comment. Has this ever happened in your bible studies?
In the 11th chapter, we find what is referred to by most of the elderships of the land as a ?controversial? subject; a sensitive issue.
In this chapter, we find the commandment given that teaches the woman to not cut her hair and for her to wear a covering over her hair in the public worship services to God.
For hundreds of years, before the last century, all who called themselves religious followed these commandments, but in this century have discarded them as being valid.
Now, if your please, turn your Bible now to the passage in question, the 11th chapter of I Corinthians.
Notice: At the very beginning of this chapter, Paul praises the church because they had kept the laws that he had shared with them in the past.
Key Point:
Some question whether the covering is to be worn all the time, or just in the worship assembly; and here at the first we find the answer given to us by the scriptures.
This chapter has a direct reference to the public assembly of the saints in worship.
1 Corinthians 11:1-2 KJV-- 1 Be ye followers of me, even as I also [am] of Christ. 2 Now I praise you, brethren, that ye remember me in all things, and keep the ordinances, as I delivered [them] to you.
The word used in the original Greek manuscripts that is translated here in I Corinthians 11.2 into the English word ?ordinances? means a concrete precept or law.
Below is the definition as given by a Greek expert from a Greek Lexicon.
3862 paradosiv paradosis par-ad?-os-is; AV- translated as ?tradition? 12 times, and as ?ordinance? 1time. 1) giving up, giving over; 1a) the act of giving up; 1b) the surrender of cities;2) a giving over which is done by word of mouth or in writing, i.e. tradition by instruction, narrative, precept, etc. ;2a) objectively, that which is delivered, the substance of a teaching; 2b) of the body of precepts, esp. ritual, which in the opinion of the later Jews were orally delivered by Moses and orally transmitted in unbroken succession to subsequent generations, which precepts, both illustrating and expanding the written law, as they did were to be obeyed with equal reverence.
Strong's Ref. # 3862; Romanized paradosis; Pronounced par-ad'-os-is;
from GSN3860; transmission, i.e. (concretely) a precept; specifically, the Jewish traditionary law: KJV--ordinance, tradition.
Keep in mind that the Apostle Paul had established the congregation there in the city of Corinth and had taught them most of the precepts they were supposed to keep while he was present there with them.
I want you to notice that the same word ?paradosis? is translated 12 times as ?tradition? and only once as ?ordinances? here in I Corinthians 11.2.
Although the word ?traditions? or ?traditional? can be understood to mean the teachings of men, and not from God; that is not the case when the tradition comes by the inspiration of the Holy Spirit.
We notice particularly in the letter to the Thessalonians that there were 2 ways by which they had received the traditions and that was by (a.) word; and by (b.) epistle.
Whether they had heard a man of God preach it to them or whether they had read it in an epistle or letter; both were valid teachings of the will of Christ and they were told to stand fast and keep these traditions.
2 Thessalonians 2:15-- Therefore, brethren, stand fast, and hold the traditions which ye have been taught, whether by word, or our epistle.
Again, in the same letter, we find the seriousness of not keeping the traditions of the Apostles? doctrine.
2 Thessalonians 3:6-- Now we command you, brethren, in the name of our Lord Jesus Christ, that ye withdraw yourselves from every brother that walketh disorderly, and not after the tradition which he received of us.
I Corinthians 11 begins with Paul?s admonition for the church to follow his example and to keep his teachings.
The Apostle Paul followed Christ and so we should listen to what he has to say, regardless of the subject.
There is conclusive evidence that the Apostle Paul begins this chapter in reference to the public worship services of the congregational assembly together.
According to WE Vines Expository Dictionary of the Bible; when we find the Greek word ?paradosis?; this refers to an apostolic teaching of instructions to the gathering together of the believers.
COMMANDED TRADITIONS
Not one word, that language experts have to say, can change the meaning of what Paul is about to say in our study of I Corinthians 11.
If Paul commanded the church of Christ to follow a tradition from the past; then this teaching in an epistle would have verified it to become the law of Christ to the church.
We know from our studies in the Old Testament that it was common practice for the Jewish woman to cover her head in the presence of God.
One place that we see this as evidence is found in Numbers 5.18; on the occasion where the husband was jealous of his wife and suspected her of cheating on him with another man.
Both the husband and his wife were told to come together in the presence of the priest and she was told to drink bitter water.
This was a religious exercise in the presence of a priest of God.
Numbers 5:18 KJV-- 18 And the priest shall set the woman before the LORD, and uncover the woman's head, and put the offering of memorial in her hands, which [is] the jealousy offering: and the priest shall have in his hand the bitter water that causeth the curse:
What do we discover from this verse?
Answer: When she came into the assembly, she came with her head covered.
Just because something had been traditionally done by the Jews for hundreds of years did not make it wrong necessarily for it to be in agreement with the Apostles doctrine.
As a matter of fact, many of the instructions that we have received, in the Apostles? doctrine, as the law of Christ, are the same laws as the Jews had obeyed for hundreds of years.
I need not remind you that we are given nine commandments that are similar to nine of the Ten Commandments, as we see that they were taught as a part of the law of Christ to His church.
Just because some commandment given in the Apostles? doctrine was similar or identical to a commandment in the Law of Moses did not make it of no effect.
The Law of Moses was fulfilled at the death of Jesus Christ on the cross; but those laws that were exactly like those included in the law of Moses were many times also included in the Law of Christ.
With your Bible open to I Corinthians 11, look now at verse 3. Here we see Apostle Paul laying the groundwork for his instructions by reminding them of the order of things in the church regarding authority.
The first order of business is to remind the church that there is an order of spiritual headship in the church.
1 Corinthians 11:3 KJV-- 3 But I would have you know, that the head of every man is Christ; and the head of the woman [is] the man; and the head of Christ [is] God.
Do you suppose that changing customs of the centuries passing have changed Jehovah God?s divine order of headship?
Nay, not so; but we know that Christ is subject to God Almighty, and that Christ is over man in authority. Although I have given you the correct answer to the question, I understand that some of the mainstream congregations are placing women now in positions not authorized by the Scriptures, and in direct rebellion to I Cor. 11.3. However, just because some are violating the will of Christ does not make it right. The way is strait and narrow, and few there be that find it.
Does it not also make sense that the head of the woman is still the man?
THE KEY
I want you to remember that this verse is the key verse that contains the key to unlocking any mystery that the rest of this passage may hold for you regarding the hair and the covering.
All things in the church depend upon the authority that Christ has over His church.
In the church order of things, the man is over the woman, any woman in the church worship assembly.
1 Timothy 2:11-12 KJV-- 11 Let the woman learn in silence with all subjection. 12 But I suffer not a woman to teach, nor to usurp authority over the man, but to be in silence.
IN SUBJECTION
There is no question that the above verse has reference to the woman as being in subjection to the man in the worship assembly.
The woman must learn in silence during the worship assembly of the saints.
She is instructed to learn in silence.
She has no God-given authority over the man in any way in the worship services.
The woman is specifically commanded to not attempt to take away the authority of the man by asking questions or by teaching in the worship.
The woman, like the man are both under the rule of the laws of Christ.
It is true that sometimes both sexes are referred to when we read the word ?man? in the English language; and in the Bible.
However this is not the case when the English word ?man? has been translated from the Greek word ?aner?; which has the specific meaning of any male person, with specific meanings determined from the context.
Verse 3 indicates that Christ is the head over the man.
Would anyone attempt to argue that this could mean that Christ is the head over only men who are husbands?
The woman is in subjection to all men in the worship service, not just her husband, who is a man.
COVERED, OR UNCOVERED?
Now look at the passage of scripture that brings about so much confusion in the church.
1 Corinthians 11:4-16 KJV-- 4 Every man praying or prophesying, having [his] head covered, dishonoureth his head. 5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with [her] head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven. 6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered. 7 For a man indeed ought not to cover [his] head, forasmuch as he is the image and glory of God: but the woman is the glory of the man. 8 For the man is not of the woman; but the woman of the man. 9 Neither was the man created for the woman; but the woman for the man. 10 For this cause ought the woman to have power on [her] head because of the angels. 11 Nevertheless neither is the man without the woman, neither the woman without the man, in the Lord. 12 For as the woman [is] of the man, even so [is] the man also by the woman; but all things of God. 13 Judge in yourselves: is it comely that a woman pray unto God uncovered? 14 Doth not even nature itself teach you, that, if a man have long hair, it is a shame unto him? 15 But if a woman have long hair, it is a glory to her: for [her] hair is given her for a covering. 16 But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God.
MAN?S COVERING
First, consider that there are 2 possible situations in which a man is forbidden by God to wear a hat on his head.
1. When prophesying:
What does it mean for a person to prophesy?
The term is used in different senses in the Bible, one to denote miraculous teaching due to the possession of a spiritual gift; and the other which suggests non-miraculous teaching, whether in truth or error.
The Greek word that Paul employs here is ?proheteuo?.
According to its usage, the primary meaning of this word, which is translated ?prophesying?, is ?to tell others the divine counsels?.
Some would contend that since the gift of prophecy was a miraculous gift that these verses do not apply to the church today, since we no longer have spiritual gifts.
Let us notice that in the New Testament that there are 6 different Greek words that are translated into various forms of the word ?prophet?, ?prophet?s?, ?prophetess?, ?prophesy?, ?prophesies?, ?prophesying?, ?prophecies?, ?prophecy?, ?prophesied?, and ?prophesieth?.
Under these 6 main categories of the form of the word ?prophet?, there are in excess of 25 different meanings listed in Thayer?s Greek Lexicon of the New Testament.
According to WE Vines Dictionary, the word ?propheteuo? has two basic meanings.
The primary meaning involves the telling forth of divine counsels (Matthew 7.22; 26.68; I Corinthians 11.4-5; 13.9; 14.1,3-5,24,31.39; Rev. 11.3) and the secondary meaning is the foretelling of future events, such as found in Matthew 15.7; John 11.51; I Peter 1.10; Jude 14. Thayer?s Greek Lexicon defines the word as ?teach, refute, reprove, admonish, and to comfort others?.
Paul himself in the same letter to the Corinthians declares that he who prophesies speaks to edify, and to exhort, and to console (I Corinthians 14.3).
1 Corinthians 14:3 KJV-- 3 But he that prophesieth speaketh unto men [to] edification, and exhortation, and comfort.
The ability to prophesy could have been either the usage of a miraculous gift or the teaching by a brother who had heard the word from someone like the Apostle Paul who had the gift of prophecy.
In one sense of its meaning, whenever one is teaching in the assembly or singing (Colossians 3.16), that person is prophesying to the church.
The phrase ?praying and prophesying? in this context represents the totality of all worship acts in which the church engages.
The man who prophesies or teaches God?s Holy truth to the congregation was not allowed by God to wear a hat or covering of any kind upon his head.
To do so would have showed a great dishonor to his spiritual head.
When we preach from the pulpit today, we repeat the words of prophecy from the scriptures and it is forbidden by God?s word for us to do so with our heads covered.
It is interesting to note that no one who claims to be a Christian disagrees with this teaching regarding the covering on the man?s head; and no preacher would dare wear one while preaching or teaching or praying.
2. When a man prays in the worship service, it is forbidden for a man to wear a hat or covering.
Even though the practice of a woman wearing a hat to the worship assembly has fallen into disfavor in most of the congregations of the church, we never see a man wear a hat in the worship service.
You might ask all the preachers you know or can contact: Would the congregations of the churches of Christ where you preach allow you to wear a hat in the worship without some sort of public reprimand?
I would like to make a point here about the covering of the man before we proceed to the study of the woman.
If the hair were a covering, would a man have to shave his hair off in order for him to obey the commandment of I Corinthians 11.4, which shows that it is a dishonor for a man to have his head covered?
To be consistent in rightly dividing the word of truth, we have to admit then that the Apostle Paul does not mean the hair, but instead a literal covering that the man or woman has the ability to take off or put on before entering to worship God.
I want us to realize how that the church has manipulated this passage of scripture to suit their fleshly desires.
If hair were sufficient to cover a woman?s head in prayer, why would we deny that a man has his head covered, when he prays with hair on his head?
Ponder this question: How does a man cover his head?
Verse 7 states that a man indeed out not to cover his head, thus indicating that the man has the ability to do so when he comes before God to worship him.
According to the Greek experts on language, such as Thayer and Vine, to cover in I Corinthians 11.6-7 is an active process of covering oneself or veiling the head.
So, we conclude that it is a shame for a man to come into the worship service and actively and physically do something to cover up his head; and by doing so, he dishonors Christ, who is his head.
VERSE 5
Notice with me now verse 5, where the woman is mentioned.
Here the scripture says that the woman brings dishonor upon the men in the congregation when she prays or prophesies with her head uncovered.
1Co 11:5 KJV
5 But every woman that prayeth or prophesieth with [her] head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven.
IN THE WORSHIP OR ANYWHERE?
Regardless of whether a woman has the right to teach in the worship service from the pulpit, or not; OR whether this passage refers to anytime night or day that she teaches, admonishes, rebukes, or comforts others; all Bible students must still deal with this passage of scriptures to discern its meaning.
For instance, some in the church choose to disregard this passage altogether as having any meaning whatsoever to the worship services of the church.
One of the objections used against the covering today is the commandment that teaches the woman to keep silence in the services; that she is not permitted to speak.
The same brethren will then allow the woman to speak in their assemblies, such as in the Bible studies, and allow her to ask questions, and to argue, to exhort, to edify, pray, and also to even teach Bible classes in the company of men.
However, they will use the Scriptures that teach the woman to be silent to rightly prove that the woman has no Scriptural authority to preach or to pray in a mixed assembly of the church.
They disregard the very passage of scripture that they use for their objection and are inconsistent in their argument against the covering of the woman?s head.
If that is the case, then the woman woud have to be covered in all circumstances outside of the worship service in which she prophesies or teaches others, which is not supported by these Scriptures.
Every single time that she prays, she must be covered, that is, if one contends that I Corinthians 11 does NOT refer to the public assembly of the church.
But, we can prove that this is not the case.
THE EXPLANATION:
The explanation is that the woman is not allowed to publicly prophesy (except in singing) or pray (except silently) in the worship service at all and to do so puts her in the position of authority equal to the man.
When she proclaims herself to be man?s equal, she discards her covering and boldly teaches in the worship services and leads in prayer.
According to this line of thinking, the admonition of the Apostle Paul that says ?every woman that prays or prophesieth with her head uncovered dishonoureth her head: for that is even all one as if she were shaven? takes on a different meaning than what is commonly taught.
It is the same as if Paul were saying ? I am ashamed of you women standing up there in church taking a place that only belongs to the man; and you have discarded your covering; and not only that, but you prophesy and lead in the prayers as if you had the same right as the man.?
The woman spoken of in verse 5 was rebellious in 2 ways.
1. She had discarded her covering or veil in rebellion to the commandment of Christ.
2. She had usurped the authority of the men in the congregation by publicly preaching and leading in prayer.
So, when she prophesied and prayed with her head uncovered, she dishonored her head.
As long as she was in subjection, she would have her head covered in the services, and obey the commandment to be silent.
Those who misunderstand this passage of scriptures have assumed that the woman spoken of by the Apostle Paul had the approval of God to vocally pray and teach as long
as they had their covering on.
With this assumption, they are always faced with the difficulty of other scriptures which contradict this erroneous position (I Corinthians 14.33-35).
1 Corinthians 14:33-35 KJV-- 33 For God is not [the author] of confusion, but of peace, as in all churches of the saints. 34 Let your women keep silence in the churches: for it is not permitted unto them to speak; but [they are commanded] to be under obedience, as also saith the law. 35 And if they will learn any thing, let them ask their husbands at home: for it is a shame for women to speak in the church.
As long as we understand that a woman could prophesy when she sang vocally in the worship services; and that she was silently allowed to pray to God in the worship services; then we have no contradiction with this passage above in I Corinthians 14.33-35.
It is not permitted for them to speak, which does not forbid singing, or silently participating in prayers, led by men.
Do you know of any passage of scripture where a woman is commanded to prophesy in the church, vocally speaking, to teach?
If a woman publicly taught or prophesied in a verbal manner in the services of the church, she would violate the teaching of I Corinthians 14.33-35; which is in the same letter to the same church; so there can be no misunderstanding of the intentions of the scriptures.
A Godly and righteous woman will cover her head during her worship to God and she will not speak during the public assembly of the church because this is shameful and dishonorable to God.
The Apostle Paul did not say that the woman could cover her head and then publicly and vocally or verbally speak out in prayer or to teach the church in the public assembly; but instead he taught the woman to cover her head and remain in subjection.
POWER BECAUSE OF THE ANGELS
In verses 8 and 9, the Apostle Paul gives us the reason why a woman should have power on her head and we see in verse 10 that it was because of the angels.
Man did not originate from the woman. If there had never been Adam created, there would never had been the first woman Eve created, as Eve was created for Adam, to be his helpmeet.
God did not make the man for the woman, but the woman for the man.
Genesis 2:18 KJV
18 And the LORD God said, [It is] not good that the man should be alone; I will make him an help meet for him.
For this very reason, the woman ought to have power on her head because of the angels.
If the power on her head is her hair, that is something that already has on her head.
Verse 10 implies that the power on her head is something that she should have there, something that she should PUT there.
The word ?power? comes from the Greek word ?exousia?, which is defined by WE Vine as ?authority? and he says that in I Corinthians 11.10 that the power on the woman?s head is the veil, showing that God has authority over her.
However, Thayer?s Greek Lexicon defines the word somewhat differently as ?the power of rule or government (the power of him whose will and commands must be submitted to by others and obeyed, [generally translated as ?authority?]; a sign of the husband?s authority over his wife, i.e., the veil with which propriety required a woman to cover herself.
Regardless of what the experts say that the word ?power? means, the word indicates something that the woman has the power to do, or not to do, according to her choice to comply or disobey.
A woman has the power to show her subjection to God in the presence of the angels.
The woman has the power to put the covering on her head as a token to show that she is controlled by word of God.
VEIL ON THE FACE OR HEAD?
Should the woman put a veil on that covers her face, as well as her head?
Those who argue against this doctrine of the covering as taught here by the Apostle Paul ask the question about whether the woman should veil just her head, but her face as well, as done by the Muslim women of the Middle Eastern countries today.
I would not argue that it would be unrighteous for the woman to wear a complete veil; but I would also argue that it is only necessary to cover the ?head? in order to comply with the teaching of God here in I Corinthians 11.
We see a difference made between the face and head in the scriptures in Matthew 6.17.
Matthew 6:17 KJV-- 17 But thou, when thou fastest, anoint thine head, and wash thy face;
We see from this scripture that Jesus recognized the head as being the area of the body on top of your neck where the hair grows, with the face being a different part.
INTERDEPENDENCE OF MEN AND WOMEN
Paul goes on to say in our passage of study in verses 11-12 that even though the man is in a position above the woman in authority; neither can ever be independent of one another.
The man needs the woman and the woman needs the man.
There are duties and responsibilities for each gender in the work of the Lord?s church.
In verse 13 of our text, the Apostle Paul seems to appeal to the good sense of the brethren in the church of Christ there at Corinth.
He tells them to judge the issue for themselves and he asks them to think about whether it would be proper for the woman to pray without first covering her head.
To me, it is extremely interesting that there is NO mention made of prophesying in this question.
We know that a woman can pray to God silently in worship as a man leads all of the congregation in prayer; but the woman could not silently prophesy.
Next, Paul addresses an entirely different doctrinal matter for the church. Unfortunately the King James translation of the Bible has caused some confusion for many as this translation has 2 different Greek words here translated as similar words.
In verses 4, 6, and 7, the words ?covered? and ?cover? are from the same Greek word ?katakalupto?. In verse 15, the word ?covering? is from a different Greek word ?peribolaion?.
?Katakalupto? indicates a covering that a person can put on himself, or herself and that they can also remove.
?Peribolaion? is nature?s covering that God provides.
Verse 14 says that it is a shame for a man to have long hair.
There is to be a distinction then in the length of a man and a woman?s hair.
As we see in verse 14 and 15, in order for a man to please God, he must have short hair, and the woman must have long hair.
In order for a man to have short hair, he must cut off his hair on a regular basis.
A man must keep his hair cut short, and the woman must let her hair grow and not cut it.
The long hair is shown here to be her glory.
There are 3 lengths of hair mentioned in I Corinthians 11.
1. Shaven
2. Shorn
3. Long
· To be shaven means to take a razor and remove the hair close to the skin of the scalp.
· To be shorn, sheared means to cut the hair, similar to the process of shearing sheep. The same Greek word is used in Acts 8.32.
Acts 8:32 KJV
32 The place of the scripture which he read was this, He was led as a sheep to the slaughter; and like a lamb dumb before his shearer, so opened he not his mouth:
· Long hair is uncut hair.
We know this from verse 6, where it is a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven; so we can safely conclude that God does not want the woman to cut or to shave her head.
Long hair is the natural length that one?s hair will grow to, if left alone and not cut.
It would be wrong to assume that a woman?s long hair has been given her as a substitute for an artificial veil or covering.
· A woman could have long hair and not show her submission to man or God.
She might like long hair as her hairstyle; and this does not show her submission to her head; but if she comes into the worship with a hat or scarf on, we can visibly see her submission to the Word of God.
1 Corinthians 11:6 KJV
6 For if the woman be not covered, let her also be shorn: but if it be a shame for a woman to be shorn or shaven, let her be covered.
Let us assume, just for the moment, to make a contrasting point, that the false teachers are correct in stating that the hair is the only covering required here by God.
This is not true, but by arguing from their position, we shall be able to see the place they are in error.
In other words, we would argue that any woman who had any hair whatsoever on the top of her scalp would be covered enough to please God when she comes into the worship services.
What would the phrase ?if the woman be not covered? be equal to?
If any hair at all means that she is covered; would she not have to be completely bald to be ?not covered??
Would she have to shave off her hair to ?be not covered??
If we follow this logic, in order for a woman to be not covered she would have to not have any hair at all.
Shaving her head would not even make her ?not covered?.
She would have to be shiny bald.
If the opponents to the truth are correct, how could the woman then obey the Apostle Paul?s commandment given in verse 6?
If the woman is not covered, let her be shorn.
How could the woman go to the beauty shop and get her hair cut if she was already bald?
Do we not see how illogical this argument can be?
In answering the opponents, the hair is not something she can put on and take off.
If she were not covered, as verse 6 states, then she would not have any hair at all, would she? If she were bald already, how then could she then cut her hair off, or shave her head?
How can she cut off that which she does not have?
Common sense dictates that the covering in verses 5 and 6 can in no way refer to the woman?s hair.
VERSE 16
1 Corinthians 11:16 KJV
16 But if any man seem to be contentious, we have no such custom, neither the churches of God.
Here Paul is not telling the church that it is acceptable to throw away this doctrine if someone in the church is against it.
The word ?contentious? means ?fond of strife or disputing or quarrelling?.
What Paul is stating is that if someone disagrees with the tradition that is taught here in I Corinthians 11 and teaches some other custom instead, then the churches of God have no such custom as the contentious man has.
Notice he outcome of a contentious man according to the writings of the Apostle Paul to the church in Rome.
Romans 2:8 KJV
8 But unto them that are contentious, and do not obey the truth, but obey
unrighteousness, indignation and wrath,
This issue appears to be plain and simple in the light of examining the scriptures; but know this, that I have been taught this doctrine all of my life.
Even though I have held to most of the beliefs of my youth, I have tried my best to be obedient to the scriptures that have commanded me to prove what is that good and acceptable and perfect will of Christ.
When I examine this passage of scripture, I found that my childhood teaching was faithful and true.
Romans 12:2 KJV
2 And be not conformed to this world: but be ye transformed by the renewing of your mind, that ye may prove what [is] that good, and acceptable, and perfect, will of God.
I hope and pray that you too will study to show yourself approved unto God and that you will have the strength and conviction to stand then with Christ, regardless of what you have learned as a child.
We are now men and women as servants of Christ, and we cannot be partial to the beliefs of others.
God bless us all as we study to stand approved before God.
I want to leave you with this final Holy Spirit inspired passage from the writings of the Apostle Paul:
1 Corinthians 4:17 ¶ For this cause have I sent unto you Timotheus, who is my beloved son, and faithful in the Lord, who shall bring you into remembrance of my ways which be in Christ, as I teach every where in every church.